axiom

Resources for wild animals: IELTS Task 2 essay #5, band 6.0

A student’s answer to this repeated IELTS question, shared without their name and marked by Axiom on the four criteria. Select a highlighted passage to see how it could be revised, and why.

288 words. Marked by Axiom on 13 August 2026. Estimated by AI. It isn’t an official IELTS score.

Task 2288 words

Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given to protect wild animals and birds. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Many individuals think that there is too much attention and too many resources for protecting wild animals and birds. I strongly agree with this notion, for saving endangered animal world, we should take responsibility as people with pure heart by giving attention and some resources.

In today's modern world, we cannot see the special animals due to their extinction. When there is a kind of animal or bird which is entered to the "Red Book", by spending money and providing food for them, we can save their types for the future. For example, take mount deer, which caused extinction in my country of Uzbekistan and is entered to the "Red Book" some years ago. To increase its numbers, the government took actions by allocating much of their budgeted money and providing shelters and food. As a result, that kind of deer continued to growth in numbers.

  1. Lexical resource

    RevisedTo save them, wealthy individuals or governments often allocate significant resources to support conservation efforts.

    The revised sentence is more accurate in terms of word choice and collocation.

There are so many people who hunt animals and birds which are extinct, for usage or selling their fur. If officials set stricter rule like taxes for hunters for hunting endangered animal or bird, by running from paying the money they may stop their actions. As a consequence, both governments and people can save endangered species.

  1. Lexical resource

    RevisedI believe that we have a responsibility, as caring individuals, to protect endangered species.

    The revised sentence is more accurate and natural in terms of word choice and collocation.

  2. Coherence & cohesion

    RevisedPeople's involvement can actually contribute to the extinction of species.

    The revised sentence is more coherent and the intended meaning is made more explicit.

  3. Grammar & accuracy

    RevisedGovernment's involvement can be beneficial by taking appropriate actions.

    The revised sentence is grammatically more accurate and clear.

People should be pure-hearted by giving a help to species.

  1. Coherence & cohesion

    RevisedIn conclusion, both government officials and ordinary citizens must take responsibility to prevent the extinction of animals and birds.

    The revised sentence is more explicit and reinforces the point made in the essay.

  2. Coherence & cohesion

    RevisedIntroducing taxes on hunting could deter people from hunting endangered species for profit.

    The revised sentence is more coherent and the intended meaning is made more explicit.

Select a highlighted passage to see its suggested revision.

Estimated by AI. It isn’t an official IELTS score.

What Axiom wrote for each criterion: why the answer earned its band, and what to work on next.

Coherence & cohesion

Band 6.0/ 9

The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the use of cohesive devices and the overall cohesion of the essay. The essay follows a logical structure, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes inaccurate or missing, making the argument difficult to follow. Additionally, there are some issues with coherence, as the connection between ideas is not always clear. More explicit signposting language could help to improve the overall coherence of the essay. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and reinforcing the overall argument.

Suggestions

  • Use a variety of cohesive devices to ensure smooth transition between ideas.
  • Make the connection between ideas more explicit to improve coherence.

Sentence revisions 3

  • RevisedIn conclusion, both government officials and ordinary citizens must take responsibility to prevent the extinction of animals and birds.

    The revised sentence is more explicit and reinforces the point made in the essay.

  • RevisedPeople's involvement can actually contribute to the extinction of species.

    The revised sentence is more coherent and the intended meaning is made more explicit.

  • RevisedIntroducing taxes on hunting could deter people from hunting endangered species for profit.

    The revised sentence is more coherent and the intended meaning is made more explicit.

Grammar & accuracy

Band 6.0/ 9

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms and there are some errors in grammar and punctuation. The essay uses a variety of sentence structures, which adds some variety and interest to the writing. However, there are some grammatical errors and inaccuracies in punctuation that can affect the overall clarity and readability of the essay. Additionally, the use of more formal language could help to enhance the overall quality of the essay.

Sentence revisions 3

  • RevisedWe should take responsibility, as caring individuals, for saving endangered animals by giving them our attention and resources.

    The revised sentence is grammatically more accurate and clear.

  • RevisedFor example, the mount deer, which was declared extinct in my country, Uzbekistan, and listed on the 'Red Book' some years ago.

    The revised sentence is grammatically more accurate and clear.

  • RevisedGovernment's involvement can be beneficial by taking appropriate actions.

    The revised sentence is grammatically more accurate and clear.

Lexical resource

Band 7.0/ 9

The essay uses a range of vocabulary and there is some evidence of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation. The essay demonstrates a good command of a range of vocabulary related to the topic, with some use of less common and idiomatic language. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation that could be improved. Additionally, the use of more formal language could help to enhance the overall quality of the essay.

Sentence revisions 3

  • RevisedTo save them, wealthy individuals or governments often allocate significant resources to support conservation efforts.

    The revised sentence is more accurate in terms of word choice and collocation.

  • RevisedWhen a species is listed as endangered, it is crucial to provide them with the necessary resources to ensure their survival.

    The revised sentence is more accurate and natural in terms of word choice and collocation.

  • RevisedI believe that we have a responsibility, as caring individuals, to protect endangered species.

    The revised sentence is more accurate and natural in terms of word choice and collocation.

Task response

Band 6.0/ 9

The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. The essay addresses the task and presents a clear position throughout the response. However, the argument could be more fully developed and supported with specific examples. Additionally, the conclusion could be more effective in summarizing the main points and reinforcing the overall argument.

Suggestions

  • Include more specific examples to support the argument.
  • Ensure that each paragraph has a clear focus and is well-developed.

Check your own essay on this question

Write your answer and Axiom marks it the same way: a band for each criterion, and revisions for your own sentences. How the Task 2 checker works.

Check an essay free