axiom

Average house prices: IELTS Task 1 answer #32, band 7.0

A student’s answer to this repeated IELTS question, shared without their name and marked by Axiom on the four criteria. Select a highlighted passage to see how it could be revised, and why.

226 words. Marked by Axiom on 25 June 2026. Estimated by AI. It isn’t an official IELTS score.

The line graph this answer describes

Average house prices (IELTS Task 1 line graph)Country A, Country B, Country C for 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, in thousand dollars. Values are approximate, read from the original chart.0200400600800199719992001200320052007200920112013
Average house prices (IELTS Task 1 line graph)Country A, Country B, Country C for 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, in thousand dollars. Values are approximate, read from the original chart.020040060080019972001200520092013
Values in thousand dollars. Values approximate: read from the original chart, not printed on it.
Show the data
Average house prices (IELTS Task 1 line graph) (thousand dollars)
Country ACountry BCountry C
1997150125100
1998175200125
1999200225125
2000200250150
2001300275150
2002400300150
2003550300175
2004500325175
2005475375200
2006450300200
2007500275225
2008550275150
2009600375250
2010600475275
2011600500275
2012625525300
2013600500300
2014625500275

Academic Task 1226 words

The graph below shows the average house prices in three countries between the years 1997 and 2014.

The line graph illustrates the changes in accommodation costs in three countries from 1997 to 2014.Overall, the house prices in the given countries While Country A generally had higher housing costs, followed by Country B, Country C remained at

  1. Lexical resource

    Revisedfollowed upward trends, although at different rates.

    'Followed upward trends' is a more natural collocation.

the bottom, despite a gradual increase.

Country A and Country B shared similar standings in the initial years, having a price tag of almost

$200,000. From that year on, the

  1. Grammar & accuracy

    RevisedThese costs began to surge at the turn of the century, with Country A raising prices to $550,000 in 2004 and Country B reaching $300,000.

    Removes unnecessary complexity and clarifies the subject.

  2. Coherence & cohesion

    RevisedBy 2009, the gap had narrowed, with Country B reaching $500,000 and Country A experiencing a slight decline to $530,000.

    Improves clarity and sentence structure.

discrepancy became more pronounced, with Country A seeing its accommodation prices skyrocket to $750,000 and Country B remaining stable in its figures.

Starting at about $120,000, the housing cost in this country followed an uninterrupted upward trajectory before doubling in 2007, after which it bounced

  1. Coherence & cohesion

    RevisedHowever, Country C showed a different pattern compared to the other two countries.

    Provides a clearer transition and explanation.

back to its starting point a year later. In 2009, this figure rebounded to $250,000 and maintained a steady growth to $270,000 in 2013,

  1. Grammar & accuracy

    Revisedafter which it fell back to its previous peak of $250,000.

    Improves grammatical accuracy and flow.

Select a highlighted passage to see its suggested revision.

Estimated by AI. It isn’t an official IELTS score.

What Axiom wrote for each criterion: why the answer earned its band, and what to work on next.

Coherence & cohesion

Band 7.0/ 9

The essay is logically organized with clear paragraphs and a logical progression of ideas. There is a clear overview and comparisons are made between the countries. However, some transitions between sentences and paragraphs could be smoother, and referencing could be clearer in places.

Suggestions

  • Use more linking words to connect ideas between sentences and paragraphs.
  • Clarify references to 'the former' and 'the latter' for easier reading.
  • Ensure each paragraph has a clear topic sentence.

Sentence revisions 3

  • RevisedWhile Country A generally had the highest housing costs, Country B followed closely behind, and Country C consistently had the lowest prices, despite a gradual increase.

    Clarifies the comparison and improves flow.

  • RevisedBy 2009, the gap had narrowed, with Country B reaching $500,000 and Country A experiencing a slight decline to $530,000.

    Improves clarity and sentence structure.

  • RevisedHowever, Country C showed a different pattern compared to the other two countries.

    Provides a clearer transition and explanation.

Grammar & accuracy

Band 7.0/ 9

The essay uses a variety of sentence structures and mostly accurate grammar. There are minor errors in article use and tense consistency, but they do not impede understanding.

Sentence revisions 3

  • RevisedThese costs began to surge at the turn of the century, with Country A raising prices to $550,000 in 2004 and Country B reaching $300,000.

    Removes unnecessary complexity and clarifies the subject.

  • Revisedafter which it fell back to its previous peak of $250,000.

    Improves grammatical accuracy and flow.

  • RevisedHowever, Country C bucked the overall trend.

    Simplifies the sentence and improves accuracy.

Lexical resource

Band 7.0/ 9

The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary, with some less common expressions such as 'bucked the trend' and 'skyrocket.' However, some word choices could be more precise, and there is slight repetition.

Sentence revisions 3

  • Revisedfollowed upward trends, although at different rates.

    'Followed upward trends' is a more natural collocation.

  • Revisedaverage price of nearly $200,000.

    'Average price' is more appropriate for the context.

  • Reviseddropped back to its original value a year later.

    'Dropped back' is more accurate than 'bounced back' for a decrease.

Task achievement

Band 8.0/ 9

The essay provides a clear overview and covers all key features of the graph, including trends, comparisons, and significant data points. Some minor details are slightly misrepresented (e.g., the exact timing of changes in Country C), but the overall task is well addressed.

Suggestions

  • Double-check specific data points and years for accuracy.
  • Include more precise figures where possible.
  • Summarize key trends at the end for a stronger conclusion.

Check your own answer on this question

Write your answer and Axiom marks it the same way: a band for each criterion, and revisions for your own sentences. How the Task 1 checker works.

Check an essay free