Reasons for absence from work: IELTS Task 1 answer #1, band 7.0
A student’s answer to this repeated IELTS question, shared without their name and marked by Axiom on the four criteria. Select a highlighted passage to see how it could be revised, and why.
235 words. Marked by Axiom on 15 December 2024. Estimated by AI. It isn’t an official IELTS score.
The bar chart this answer describes
Show the data
| 2000 | 2005 | 2010 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Illness | 44 | 40 | 35 |
| Stress | 6 | 4 | 12 |
| Personal needs | 13.5 | 20 | 23 |
| Family responsibilities | 27.5 | 26 | 26 |
| Unexpected problems | 8 | 14 | 13 |
Academic Task 1235 words
The chart below shows the results of three surveys on absenteeism in a particular European country in the years of 2000, 2005 and 2010. The results show the reasons people gave for not going to work.
The bar chart compares the proportional of results by their surveys on absenteeism in one European country between 2000, 2005 and 2010. Overall, there was upward trends in stress, personal needs and unexpected problems , whereas illness and family responsibilities show with decreasing percentages throughout the timeframe. It is also worth noting that illness stood out as the most popular reason for not going to work although it dropped over the given years, while the reverse was true for stress.
However, the difference became insignificant, with the figure for the former dropping of 20% and that for the latter remaining more or less unchanged at 18%.
Coherence & cohesion
RevisedIn 2000, personal needs accounted for 15%, while unexpected problems stood at 10%.
This revision simplifies the sentence structure and improves the flow by using a more varied time reference and reducing redundancy.
Coherence & cohesion
RevisedIn 2005, both showed a marked increase, rising to around 23% for personal needs and 18% for unexpected problems.
Using a specific year instead of 'the subsequent year' improves the clarity and makes the timeline more precise for the reader.
Coherence & cohesion
RevisedStarting at almost 6% in 2000, stress went down to 5% before reaching a peak of 14% in 2010.
This revision clarifies the timeline by using the specific year of 2010 instead of 'the final year', improving the coherence of the narrative.
In 2005, both of them declined to 40% and 23%, respectively.
Lexical resource
RevisedIn contrast, a different pattern can be observed in the remaining reasons.
The phrase 'remaining others' is too vague - specifying 'reasons' makes it clear what you are referring to.
Lexical resource
RevisedBoth illness and family responsibilities showed a decreasing trend over the time period.
The phrase 'exhibited downward trends' is a bit formal and could be simplified to 'showed a decreasing trend' for better clarity and naturalness.
Lexical resource
RevisedIllness accounted for a staggering 45%, compared to family responsibilities at almost 30% in the initial year.
The phrase 'made up' is more commonly used to mean 'comprise' or 'constitute' and is more formal in this context. Additionally, 'the initial year' could be made more specific by referring to 2000.
Grammar & accuracy
RevisedWhile the rate of illness continued to decrease to 35%, family responsibilities stabilized at 23% in 2010.
The phrase 'continued constant decrease' is grammatically incorrect. The revision provides the correct structure and improves the clarity and precision of the sentence.
Select a highlighted passage to see its suggested revision.
What Axiom wrote for each criterion: why the answer earned its band, and what to work on next.
Coherence & cohesion
Band 7.0/ 9
The essay is logically organized and presents a clear overview of the main trends observed in the chart. The information is well-sequenced, making it easy for the reader to follow the analysis. However, there are a few instances where the use of cohesive devices could be improved for better clarity and flow.
Suggestions
- Use a variety of cohesive devices to improve the flow of information and make the essay more engaging. For example, instead of repeating 'in 2005' and 'in the initial year', you could use more varied time references or compare the data directly to create a more dynamic narrative.
Sentence revisions 3
RevisedIn 2000, personal needs accounted for 15%, while unexpected problems stood at 10%.
This revision simplifies the sentence structure and improves the flow by using a more varied time reference and reducing redundancy.
RevisedIn 2005, both showed a marked increase, rising to around 23% for personal needs and 18% for unexpected problems.
Using a specific year instead of 'the subsequent year' improves the clarity and makes the timeline more precise for the reader.
RevisedStarting at almost 6% in 2000, stress went down to 5% before reaching a peak of 14% in 2010.
This revision clarifies the timeline by using the specific year of 2010 instead of 'the final year', improving the coherence of the narrative.
Grammar & accuracy
Band 7.0/ 9
The essay makes use of a variety of complex structures and is generally free from grammatical errors. However, there are a few instances where the sentence structure could be improved for better clarity and precision. Additionally, using a wider range of grammatical structures, such as passive constructions, would demonstrate a higher level of grammatical proficiency.
Sentence revisions 3
RevisedBoth illness and family responsibilities showed a decreasing trend over the time period.
The use of 'exhibited' is a bit formal and could be simplified to 'showed' for better clarity and naturalness.
RevisedIn 2005, both showed a marked increase, rising to around 23% for personal needs and 18% for unexpected problems.
The original sentence is grammatically incorrect. The revision provides the correct structure and improves the clarity and precision of the sentence.
RevisedWhile the rate of illness continued to decrease to 35%, family responsibilities stabilized at 23% in 2010.
The phrase 'continued constant decrease' is grammatically incorrect. The revision provides the correct structure and improves the clarity and precision of the sentence.
Lexical resource
Band 7.0/ 9
The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary and uses some less common and idiomatic language. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice that could be refined for better precision and impact. Additionally, using a greater variety of lexical phrases related to data analysis could further enhance the lexical resource.
Sentence revisions 3
RevisedBoth illness and family responsibilities showed a decreasing trend over the time period.
The phrase 'exhibited downward trends' is a bit formal and could be simplified to 'showed a decreasing trend' for better clarity and naturalness.
RevisedIn contrast, a different pattern can be observed in the remaining reasons.
The phrase 'remaining others' is too vague - specifying 'reasons' makes it clear what you are referring to.
RevisedIllness accounted for a staggering 45%, compared to family responsibilities at almost 30% in the initial year.
The phrase 'made up' is more commonly used to mean 'comprise' or 'constitute' and is more formal in this context. Additionally, 'the initial year' could be made more specific by referring to 2000.
Task achievement
Band 7.0/ 9
The essay provides a detailed and accurate description of the information presented in the chart. The writer makes effective comparisons between the different reasons for absenteeism and identifies key trends and changes. However, the essay could be improved by providing a more thorough analysis of the data and its implications. The conclusion could also be more comprehensive in summarizing the main points and providing a final thought or recommendation.
Suggestions
- Try to provide a more in-depth analysis of the data and its implications. This could involve discussing the potential reasons for the trends identified and the possible impact on the workplace and society. Additionally, consider providing a more comprehensive conclusion that summarizes the main points and offers a final thought or recommendation.
Check your own answer on this question
Write your answer and Axiom marks it the same way: a band for each criterion, and revisions for your own sentences. How the Task 1 checker works.
Check an essay free