axiom

Reasons for absence from work: IELTS Task 1 answer #4, band 6.0

A student’s answer to this repeated IELTS question, shared without their name and marked by Axiom on the four criteria. Select a highlighted passage to see how it could be revised, and why.

287 words. Marked by Axiom on 24 February 2025. Estimated by AI. It isn’t an official IELTS score.

The bar chart this answer describes

Reasons for absence from work (IELTS Task 1 bar chart)2000, 2005, 2010 for Illness, Stress, Personal needs, Family responsibilities, Unexpected problems, in % of respondents. Values are approximate, read from the original chart.01020304050IllnessStressPersonal needsFamilyresponsibilitiesUnexpectedproblems
Reasons for absence from work (IELTS Task 1 bar chart)2000, 2005, 2010 for Illness, Stress, Personal needs, Family responsibilities, Unexpected problems, in % of respondents. Values are approximate, read from the original chart.01020304050IllnessStressPersonalneedsFamilyresponsibilitiesUnexpectedproblems
Values in % of respondents. Values approximate: read from the original chart, not printed on it.
Show the data
Reasons for absence from work (IELTS Task 1 bar chart) (% of respondents)
200020052010
Illness444035
Stress6412
Personal needs13.52023
Family responsibilities27.52626
Unexpected problems81413

Academic Task 1287 words

The chart below shows the results of three surveys on absenteeism in a particular European country in the years 2000, 2005 and 2010. The results show the reasons people gave for not going to work.

The results show the different reasons why people did not go to work.

  1. Lexical resource

    RevisedThe bar chart provides data on absenteeism survey results in a European country for the years 2000, 2005, and 2010.

    The revision uses more precise vocabulary.

  2. Coherence & cohesion

    RevisedOverall, the number of workers who did not attend work due to illness and family responsibilities showed a downward trend, whereas stress, personal needs, and unexpected problems like transport and weather showed an upward trend.

    The revision clarifies the sentence structure and improves coherence.

  3. Lexical resource

    RevisedNotably, while illness was the predominant reason for absenteeism, stress accounted for a smaller proportion.

    The revision uses more varied and precise vocabulary.

Looking at the data for downward trends, in 2000, fewer than 45 people who were ill did not go to work. However, their number decreased moderately to 40 in 2005 before falling to 35 in 2010.

  1. Grammar & accuracy

    RevisedIn terms of family responsibilities, around 27 workers were not at work.

    The subject-verb agreement is corrected.

  2. Coherence & cohesion

    RevisedIn 2005, the number slightly dropped to 25 and remained constant in 2010.

    The revision removes unnecessary words and clarifies the sentence.

As for upward trends, stress was the reason for more than 5 people for not going to work. In 2000, their number decreased briefly to under 5. Despite this, their number increased significantly, reaching about 13 in 2010. Regarding person needs, around 14 people could not go to work in 2000 because of this reason. Similarly, the number of people who were not at work due to unexpected problems was around 9 at the beginning of the period.

  1. Lexical resource

    RevisedHowever, their number significantly increased, reaching 20 and then rising further to approximately 23 by the final year.

    The revision improves lexical variety and precision.

  2. Coherence & cohesion

    RevisedIn 2005, the number increased to fewer than 15 people who could not go to work.

    The revision corrects the awkward phrasing and clarifies the meaning.

  3. Grammar & accuracy

    RevisedHowever, their number slightly decreased by about 1 in 2010.

    The sentence structure is improved for grammatical accuracy.

Select a highlighted passage to see its suggested revision.

Estimated by AI. It isn’t an official IELTS score.

What Axiom wrote for each criterion: why the answer earned its band, and what to work on next.

Coherence & cohesion

Band 6.0/ 9

The essay presents information in a logical order but lacks clear linking devices and some sentences are awkwardly constructed.

Suggestions

  • Use more linking words to connect ideas.
  • Ensure each paragraph has a clear topic sentence.
  • Avoid repetitive sentence structures.

Sentence revisions 3

  • RevisedOverall, the number of workers who did not attend work due to illness and family responsibilities showed a downward trend, whereas stress, personal needs, and unexpected problems like transport and weather showed an upward trend.

    The revision clarifies the sentence structure and improves coherence.

  • RevisedIn 2005, the number slightly dropped to 25 and remained constant in 2010.

    The revision removes unnecessary words and clarifies the sentence.

  • RevisedIn 2005, the number increased to fewer than 15 people who could not go to work.

    The revision corrects the awkward phrasing and clarifies the meaning.

Grammar & accuracy

Band 5.0/ 9

The essay contains several grammatical errors and awkward sentence structures.

Sentence revisions 3

  • RevisedIn terms of family responsibilities, around 27 workers were not at work.

    The subject-verb agreement is corrected.

  • RevisedIn 2005, the number increased to fewer than 15 people who could not go to work.

    The sentence structure is corrected for clarity.

  • RevisedHowever, their number slightly decreased by about 1 in 2010.

    The sentence structure is improved for grammatical accuracy.

Lexical resource

Band 6.0/ 9

The vocabulary is adequate but lacks variety and precision in some parts.

Sentence revisions 3

  • RevisedThe bar chart provides data on absenteeism survey results in a European country for the years 2000, 2005, and 2010.

    The revision uses more precise vocabulary.

  • RevisedNotably, while illness was the predominant reason for absenteeism, stress accounted for a smaller proportion.

    The revision uses more varied and precise vocabulary.

  • RevisedHowever, their number significantly increased, reaching 20 and then rising further to approximately 23 by the final year.

    The revision improves lexical variety and precision.

Task achievement

Band 7.0/ 9

The essay addresses the task and includes relevant information, but some details are inaccurately reported.

Suggestions

  • Ensure all data is accurately represented.
  • Include more comparisons between different categories.

Check your own answer on this question

Write your answer and Axiom marks it the same way: a band for each criterion, and revisions for your own sentences. How the Task 1 checker works.

Check an essay free