Protecting all species equally: IELTS Task 2 essay #1, band 6.5
A student’s answer to this repeated IELTS question, shared without their name and marked by Axiom on the four criteria. Select a highlighted passage to see how it could be revised, and why.
346 words. Marked by Axiom on 16 October 2026. Estimated by AI. It isn’t an official IELTS score.
Task 2346 words
Some people think that all wild animals should be protected equally. Others, however, argue that only certain important species are worth protecting. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is an ongoing debate over which type of animals should be protected.
Grammar & accuracy
RevisedWhile some argue that only certain types of animals should be prioritized, I agree that all wild animals should be equally protected,
The revised sentence corrects the article usage and the word choice.
Since they often prevent outbreak of illnesses in the wild, some might consider conducting stricter conservation of these species for the sake of their impact compared to other smaller types of mammals.
Coherence & cohesion
RevisedAdvocates of selectively designated animal protection could put forward several reasons, with the overall impact of certain wild animals on their habitats being the primary argument.
The revised sentence is more formal and academic in tone.
Grammar & accuracy
RevisedIt is known that there are certain types of animals that have a comparatively greater contribution to biodiversity in the wild.
The revised sentence corrects the word choice and the awkward construction.
Lexical resource
RevisedApex predators such as wolves, for instance, are known to have a significant impact on their ecosystems by preying on dead animals, thus preventing the spread of disease.
The revised sentence is more concise and uses more accurate terminology.
Generally, it is obvious that any kind of animals have at least minor yet hard to ignore positive impacts to the environment. These effects might not be as significant as ones brought by wolves, however, it does not justify their extinction, since loss of these wild animals might be followed by minor changes that snowball into bigger problems over time.
Coherence & cohesion
RevisedDespite these arguments, I believe that neglecting some wild animals based on different factors contradicts the main goal of animal protection.
The revised sentence is more clear and concise.
Lexical resource
RevisedBecause the food chain is considered one of the most important factors, each wild animal helps to maintain this ongoing cycle, preventing the overpopulation of the species they typically prey on.
The revised sentence corrects the grammatical errors and the awkward word choice.
Grammar & accuracy
RevisedThis is why, in order to maintain stable animal populations, governments and individuals should not categorize animals solely based on subjective measures of their importance.
The revised sentence corrects the awkward construction and the word choice.
Coherence & cohesion
RevisedIn conclusion, although there are various reasons for providing greater protection to particular types of wild animals, I believe that every animal, regardless of their role, should be under protection for their irreplaceable part in nature.
The revised sentence is more clear and concise.
Select a highlighted passage to see its suggested revision.
What Axiom wrote for each criterion: why the answer earned its band, and what to work on next.
Coherence & cohesion
Band 6.0/ 9
The essay is logically organized and the progression of ideas is clear. However, there are some issues with the flow of ideas and the use of linking words. The essay follows a logical structure, but transitions between paragraphs and within paragraphs could be smoother. The introduction sets up the topic well, but the connection between different points could be enhanced with more explicit linking phrases. Clearer topic sentences at the beginning of each paragraph and more explicit linking phrases would help guide the reader through the essay. Ensuring consistent punctuation and spacing will also improve readability.
Suggestions
- Use a wider range of linking words to improve the flow of ideas.
- Make sure that each paragraph has a clear central topic and that all sentences in the paragraph relate to this topic.
Sentence revisions 3
RevisedAdvocates of selectively designated animal protection could put forward several reasons, with the overall impact of certain wild animals on their habitats being the primary argument.
The revised sentence is more formal and academic in tone.
RevisedDespite these arguments, I believe that neglecting some wild animals based on different factors contradicts the main goal of animal protection.
The revised sentence is more clear and concise.
RevisedIn conclusion, although there are various reasons for providing greater protection to particular types of wild animals, I believe that every animal, regardless of their role, should be under protection for their irreplaceable part in nature.
The revised sentence is more clear and concise.
Grammar & accuracy
Band 7.0/ 9
The essay uses a variety of complex structures. However, there are a few grammatical errors and awkward constructions. The essay contains a few grammatical errors that affect clarity and readability. For example, "with overall impact os some wild animals on their habitats being the chief among them" should be "with the overall impact of some wild animals on their habitats being the chief reason." Paying closer attention to grammatical accuracy, including correct verb forms and preposition usage, will improve the overall quality of the essay. Additionally, varying sentence structures and using a wider range of grammatical constructions will enhance the essay's overall readability and sophistication.
Sentence revisions 3
RevisedWhile some argue that only certain types of animals should be prioritized, I agree that all wild animals should be equally protected,
The revised sentence corrects the article usage and the word choice.
RevisedIt is known that there are certain types of animals that have a comparatively greater contribution to biodiversity in the wild.
The revised sentence corrects the word choice and the awkward construction.
RevisedThis is why, in order to maintain stable animal populations, governments and individuals should not categorize animals solely based on subjective measures of their importance.
The revised sentence corrects the awkward construction and the word choice.
Lexical resource
Band 7.0/ 9
The essay demonstrates a good command of a broad lexical repertoire. However, there are a few instances of awkward or incorrect word choice. The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary, but there are instances of awkward or incorrect word choices. For example, "conribution" should be "contribution," and "responsibily" should be "responsibility." Refining word choices and ensuring correct spelling and grammar usage will improve the overall clarity and professionalism of the essay. Additionally, using a wider variety of vocabulary, including more precise and sophisticated terms, will enhance the essay's overall quality.
Sentence revisions 3
RevisedAdvocates of selectively designated animal protection could put forward several reasons, with the overall impact of certain wild animals on their habitats being the primary argument.
The revised sentence corrects the spelling mistake and the awkward word choice.
RevisedApex predators such as wolves, for instance, are known to have a significant impact on their ecosystems by preying on dead animals, thus preventing the spread of disease.
The revised sentence is more concise and uses more accurate terminology.
RevisedBecause the food chain is considered one of the most important factors, each wild animal helps to maintain this ongoing cycle, preventing the overpopulation of the species they typically prey on.
The revised sentence corrects the grammatical errors and the awkward word choice.
Task response
Band 7.0/ 9
The essay addresses the task effectively, presenting a clear position throughout the response. The essay effectively addresses the prompt by discussing both views and providing a clear personal opinion. The writer presents a well-structured argument, with each paragraph focusing on a different aspect of the issue. The introduction and conclusion are clear and relevant, and the overall argument is logical and persuasive. The essay could be further improved by providing more specific examples to support the arguments and by ensuring that all points are fully developed and explained.
Suggestions
- Ensure that each paragraph fully develops a single point and is well-connected to the overall argument.
- Provide more specific examples to support your arguments.
Check your own essay on this question
Write your answer and Axiom marks it the same way: a band for each criterion, and revisions for your own sentences. How the Task 2 checker works.
Check an essay free